Legal Opinion

State v. Bickham

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 12, 2009No. 26581PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice PLEICONES:

This is an appeal from the acceptance of an Alford plea to the charge of criminal sexual conduct with a minor (CSCM) in the first degree. Appellant entered guilty pleas to two counts of CSCM in the second degree and entered an Alford plea to one count of CSCM in the first degree. The plea judge *145accepted the pleas and sentenced Appellant. Appellant contends that the plea judge erred in refusing to allow Appellant to withdraw his Alford plea to CSCM in the first degree. We disagree and affirm.

FACTS

Appellant was indicted on two counts of CSCM in the second degree and one count…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. State v. McKinneySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982
  3. State v. RiddleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rolen v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
  2. Fleming v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
  3. Rolen v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
  4. State v. BickhamSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
  5. State v. DonahueCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API