State v. Woodruff
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtKerns, J.
The defendant-appellant, Charles “Tink” Woodruff, was tried by jury in the Court of Common Pleas of Clark County and found guilty of rape in violation of R.C. 2907.02(A)(1) and, from the judgment and sentence thereupon entered in the trial court, Woodruff has perfected an appeal to this court.
According to the record, a polygraph examination was given to the rape victim, one Shelly Lambert, to determine the truthfulness of her answers to questions as to whether she consented to intercourse. The examination was given to the victim during the investigation of the crime by the police, but the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. SouelOhio Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 1960
- State v. HegelOhio Court of Appeals · 1964
- State v. TownsOhio Court of Appeals · 1973
3Cited by33 opinions
- State v. JacksonOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. SpirkoOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- Center Ridge Ganley, Inc. v. StinnOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. ScottOhio Court of Appeals · 1987
- State v. BarnettOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.