Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 27, 1960No. 5358PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Fess, J'.

This is an appeal on questions of law from a judgment and sentence of defendant-appellant upon a verdict of the jury finding defendant guilty of sodomy. The principal error assigned is the admission of testimony pertaining to a polygraph test given defendant.

Upon direct examination of a state highway patrolman, who had interviewed the defendant after his arrest, the following transpired:

“Now Officer Blay, did you ask him at that time whether or not he would take a polygraph test which is a lie detector test?
“Mr. Ischler: Objection.
“The Court: Overruled.
“A. Yes, I did.

‘ ‘ Q. What was…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TruittSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. McCain v. SheridanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  3. Kornreich v. Industrial Fire Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1936
  4. City of Troy v. CumminsOhio Court of Appeals · 1958
  5. State v. HickmanOhio Court of Appeals · 1956

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. People v. BarbaraMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Henry Maldonado v. Julius Wilson, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  3. State v. CataneseSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
  4. People v. ZazzettaIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
  5. United States v. DeBethamDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1972

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API