State v. Smith
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Fess, J'.
This is an appeal on questions of law from a judgment and sentence of defendant-appellant upon a verdict of the jury finding defendant guilty of sodomy. The principal error assigned is the admission of testimony pertaining to a polygraph test given defendant.
Upon direct examination of a state highway patrolman, who had interviewed the defendant after his arrest, the following transpired:
“Now Officer Blay, did you ask him at that time whether or not he would take a polygraph test which is a lie detector test?
“Mr. Ischler: Objection.
“The Court: Overruled.
“A. Yes, I did.
‘ ‘ Q. What was…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Commonwealth v. TruittSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- McCain v. SheridanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Kornreich v. Industrial Fire Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1936
- City of Troy v. CumminsOhio Court of Appeals · 1958
- State v. HickmanOhio Court of Appeals · 1956
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- People v. BarbaraMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
- Henry Maldonado v. Julius Wilson, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- State v. CataneseSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
- People v. ZazzettaIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
- United States v. DeBethamDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1972
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.