Massell Realty Co. v. Hanbury
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtI-Iinrs, J.
(After stating the- foregoing facts.)
The first question for our decision is whether or not the contract of sale is sufficiently certain and definite as to be capable of being enforced by decree for specific performance. Under our statute of frauds, all contracts for the sale of land or any interest therein must be in writing, signed bjr the party to be charged therewith, or some person by him lawfully authorized. Civil Code (1910), § 3222, par. 4. Every essential element of a sale must be expressed in writing to meet the requirements of the statute. Tippins v. Phillips, 123 Ga. 415, 417 (51…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- McCabe v. HealyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Tippins v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Johnson v. McKaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Herrin v. AbbeSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
- Cowart v. SingletarySupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Hadaway v. HadawaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- Morgan v. HemphillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
- Sturdivant v. WalkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
- Hines v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Barto v. HicksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.