Legal Opinion
Treemond Co. v. Schering Corp.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided November 12, 1940No. 273PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
FORMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff alleges that it imports, has in its possession, and offers for sale a certain chemical known under the names “Estradiol”, dihydro follicle hormone, dihydroxyestrin, dihydrofolliculin or dihydrotheelin. Upon learning of this plaintiff declares that defendant caused its agents to inform customers of plaintiff and published statements to the effect that Estradiol was covered by a patent owned by defendant and that it alone had a right to manufacture it. Plaintiff advertised the sale of Estradiol in the Drug Trade News, a trade journal, on March 14, 28 and April…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Virtue v. Creamery Package Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Zenie Bros. v. MiskendDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1935
- Automotive Equipment v. Trico Products CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1935
- Kelley v. Ypsilanti Dress-Stay Manuf'g Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan · 1890
- Virtue v. Creamery Package Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Treemond Co. v. Schering CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941