Legal Opinion
Neelley v. Walker
District Court, M.D. Alabama
Decided March 25, 2016No. CASE NO. 2:14-CV-269-WKWPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
W. Keith Watkins, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
This case challenges the constitutionality of an Alabama law affecting parole eligibility for certain inmates. No State shall, under Article I, Section Ten of the United States Constitution, pass any bill of attainder or ex post facto law. U.S. Const, art. I, § 10, cl. 1. To attack a state statute on these grounds, a challenger must bring suit within the temporal limitations period ascribed to her cause of action. And time, like the tide, waits for no one.1 •
• Before the court is Defendants’ Motion for Summary…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Judith A. Neelley v. Clifford WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017