Legal Opinion

Fruehauf Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 6, 1989No. 2804 C.D. 1988PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BARRY, Judge.

The Fruehauf Corporation (employer) appeals an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which reversed a decision of a referee which had granted the employer’s modification petition.

Gerald Michaels, the claimant, suffered a work related injury to his left elbow in February of 1983. While he was collecting benefits for total disability, the employer filed a modification petition, alleging that the claimant was no longer totally disabled. At a hearing, the employer proved that a farm owned and operated by the claimant’s family earned between $4,000 and $4,500…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Clingan v. Fairchance Lumber Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  3. Connolly v. CampbellCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. U.S. Airways v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Washington Post v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Joy Technologies, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. ANR Freight System v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Long v. Injured Workers' Insurance FundCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2015

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API