Legal Opinion

Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Home Insurance

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided January 27, 1998No. 96-P-792PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillerman, J.

This declaratory judgment action involves multiple insurance coverage issues. The facts are not in dispute. The underlying claims involved an auto accident in which two complaints were filed against Zee’s Wallpaper to Go (Zee’s) and Jodi Zitofsky (Jodi), the seventeen year old operator who allegedly drove through a red light causing a collision.2 Zee’s, a business owned by Jodi’s parents, owned the automobile Jodi was driving at the time of the accident, a Mercury Sable station wagon (Mercury). Because Jodi was a minor at the time of the accident, the complaints in the underlying actions also…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Polaroid Corp. v. the Travelers Indemnity Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
  2. Sterilite Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
  3. Boston Symphony Orchestra, Inc. v. Commercial Union InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  4. Worcester Mutual Insurance v. MarnellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  5. Bishop v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Raytheon Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2000
  2. Auto-Owners Insurance Co. v. PetrikDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  3. Rizzo v. Federal Pacific Co.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2001
  4. United National Insurance v. Providence Washington InsuranceMassachusetts Superior Court · 2008
  5. Welch Foods, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Superior Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API