Legal Opinion

Auto-Owners Insurance Co. v. Petrik

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 7, 2005No. 2D03-5449Published

1Opinion of the Court

NORTHCUTT, Judge.

The trial court held that an automobile liability policy issued to Gerd Petrik provided coverage for injuries suffered by Nihad Christian Jarallah in an accident with Gerd’s wife, Feli Petrik. We concur in the court’s determination that there was coverage under the terms of the policy, because the automobile Feli Petrik was driving at the time of the accident .was neither furnished nor available for her regular use, and it was not used in an auto sales agency that she owned or operated. We therefore affirm the issue on appeal without further discussion. On cross-appeal,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Koikos v. Travelers Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2003
  2. BILTMORE CONST. CO., INC. v. Owners Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  3. Hartford Ins. Co. v. BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  4. Auto-Owners Ins. Co. v. ProughDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  5. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Home InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API