Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Boyd v. Mills

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1925No. 19101. Department TwoPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

This is a test case to determine the manner of payment of local improvement district bonds where the entire bond issue has matured and there is not sufficient money in the fund to pay the bonds in full.

The petition, as amended, alleges that relator is the owner of certain bonds of local improvement district No. 289 of Everett; that that district was duly organized and bonds duly issued against the local improvement district fund of the district on December 2, 1913, maturing December 2, 1923; that certain bonds, including relator’s, are wholly unpaid. It is further alleged that there is now…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jewell v. City of SuperiorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1904
  2. Thomas v. PattersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1916
  3. Wilson v. EigenbrodtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
  4. First National Bank v. AndrewsWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Welsing v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Meyers v. City of Idaho FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
  2. State Ex Rel. Sturdivant Bank v. Little River Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934
  3. Lucas v. First Nat. Bank of PawneeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. State Ex Rel. Ackerman v. City of CarlsbadNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1935
  5. State Ex Rel. Central Auxiliary Corp. v. RorabeckMontana Supreme Court · 1940

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API