Legal Opinion

People v. McVey

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 27, 1966No. Crim. 260PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConley, P. J.

The defendant and a companion were accused in the information of burglarizing the Hornet Drive-In located at 2336 Pair Oaks Boulevard in Sacramento. The burglars entered the restaurant by forcing one of the doors during the nighttime; they stole a miscellaneous lot of personal property, including a novelty vending machine, an PM/AM radio, a public address system and amplifier, four or five pounds of bacon, a box of frozen cube steaks, and a canned Dubuque ham. On the appeal, it is not claimed that the burglary did not occur as charged. The appeal is based wholly on a contention that the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. People v. IngleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. People v. MickelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  4. In Re DixonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  5. People v. SimonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. People v. BeasleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  2. People v. BeasleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. People v. CourtneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. People v. BooneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. Bramlette v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API