Legal Opinion

People v. Courtney

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 14, 1970No. Crim. 8287PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ELKINGTON, J.

Defendant Jack Courtney was convicted of the offense of possession of marijuana (Health & Saf. Code, § 11530) following a court trial. Imposition of judgment and sentence was suspended and he was placed on probation. His appeal from the “judgment” will be treated as an appeal from the order granting probation. (See Pen. Code, § 1237, subd. 1.)

Courtney’s first contention is that the narcotic evidence upon which his conviction was based was the product of a Fourth Amendment violation— an illegal “stop and frisk” or at least the threat of such illegal conduct.

George Bruschi…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. People v. IngleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. People v. MickelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Badillo v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. People v. RossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. People v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. United States v. Ismael Perez-EsparzaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  3. People v. AldridgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  4. People v. William G.California Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Cabell v. Lynette G.California Court of Appeal · 1976

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API