Legal Opinion

United States v. Privette

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided October 4, 1990No. ACM S28321PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

KASTL, Senior Judge:

Based upon United States v. Partyka, 30 M.J. 242 (C.M.A.1990), we hold today that the prosecution introduced improper matters in rebuttal during a sentencing proceeding. We find error and reassess.

I

Staff Sergeant Privette was convicted in accordance with his pleas of wrongful use of marijuana, in violation of Article 112a, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 912a. His sentence is a bad conduct discharge, confinement for four months, and reduction to airman.

He now argues that the military judge erred when he permitted trial counsel to bootleg improper rebuttal into a presentencing…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. SalesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  2. United States v. PeoplesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
  3. United States v. ClevelandUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
  4. United States v. PartykaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
  5. United States v. StrongUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. KomorousU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1991
  2. United States v. AcevedoU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1991
  3. United States v. CampbellU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
  4. United States v. PompeyU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API