United States v. Privette
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
KASTL, Senior Judge:
Based upon United States v. Partyka, 30 M.J. 242 (C.M.A.1990), we hold today that the prosecution introduced improper matters in rebuttal during a sentencing proceeding. We find error and reassess.
I
Staff Sergeant Privette was convicted in accordance with his pleas of wrongful use of marijuana, in violation of Article 112a, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 912a. His sentence is a bad conduct discharge, confinement for four months, and reduction to airman.
He now argues that the military judge erred when he permitted trial counsel to bootleg improper rebuttal into a presentencing…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. SalesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
- United States v. PeoplesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
- United States v. ClevelandUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
- United States v. PartykaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
- United States v. StrongUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. KomorousU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1991
- United States v. AcevedoU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1991
- United States v. CampbellU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
- United States v. PompeyU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990