Legal Opinion

Teribery v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 24, 1975No. Civ. A. No. 74-45 EriePublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF STATEMENTS OF TRAIN CREW

KNOX, District Judge.

In this action involving a grade crossing collision between the automobile in which the plaintiff’s decedent was riding and defendant’s train, the plaintiff has moved pursuant to Rule 37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to compel the production of certain documents including:

“a true and correct copy of the statements taken from the train crew involved in the accident of April 10, 1974, by employees working in behalf of the railroad on April 10, 1974, and referred to by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Southern Railway Company v. Carl Talmadge LanhamCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  2. Daniel J. McDougall Jr. v. Kenneth R. DunnCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1972
  3. Almaguer v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1972
  4. De Bruce v. Pennsylvania R. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1947

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ashmead v. HarrisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
  2. Fireman's Fund Insurance v. McAlpineSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1978
  3. United States v. Chatham City Corp.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1976
  4. Schaffer v. RogersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
  5. Berg v. Des Moines General Hospital Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API