Legal Opinion

Spangenberg v. Charles

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 10, 1892PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. S. P. McConnell, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtWaterman, P. J.

In this case it appears from the bill of exceptions that certain papers described as “ the mortgage,” “two notes,” “the certificate,” were introduced in evidence and marked exhibits “a a,” etc.; certain papers in the bill of exceptions are marked exhibits “ a a,” etc. From this we might infer that such papers are those introduced in evidence, if we were permitted to draw inferences favorable to the party who presents a bill of exceptions.

Such inference is not permissible. A bill of exceptions is regarded as a pleading of the party who presents it, and is to be construed most strongly against…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Van Cott v. SpragueAppellate Court of Illinois · 1880
  2. Graham v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Smith v. WilsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1861
  4. Alley v. LimbertAppellate Court of Illinois · 1890
  5. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. YandoIllinois Supreme Court · 1889

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Imperial Hotel Co. v. H. B. Claffin Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1894
  2. Page v. Northwestern Brewing Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1894
  3. Moses v. LoomisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1894
  4. Fred Miller Brewing Co. v. BeckingtonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1894
  5. J. S. Ziegler Co. v. Jewel Tea Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API