Legal Opinion

Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Yando

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1889PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the First District;— heard in that court on appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Joseph E. Gary, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam :

Action on the case, for personal injury. The declaration contained six counts. The first five charge negligence on the part of the servants of appellant, and due care by appellee. The cause of action set forth in the last count is correctly stated by Justice McAllister in the opinion of the Appellate Court, as follows:

“This was an action by the appellee, against the said railroad company, appellant, to recover damages for a personal injury occasioned May 15, 1885, by reason, as it is alleged, of the gross, willful and culpable negligence of the engine-driver of the defendant, in…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. HaselwoodIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. HarperIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Alley v. LimbertAppellate Court of Illinois · 1890
  4. Spangenberg v. CharlesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1892
  5. Rosengren v. Manufacturers National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1921

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API