Legal Opinion

Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of United States v. Bomar

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided October 6, 1939No. 7832PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HICKS, Circuit Judge.

Appellees, Doris W. Bomar and Claude V. Lussky, Administrators of the Estate of Henry V. Bomar, sued appellant, the Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States, upon a policy of insurance on the life of the deceased to recover disability benefits and also certain premiums which appellees alleged had been unlawfully collected and retained by appellant.

There was a verdict and judgment for appellees in the sum of $3,430 and interest *642on account of benefits, and $980 with interest on account of premiums. Appellant complains, — (1) of the denial of a directed verdict…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. LathropSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. CaveCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  3. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  4. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of U.S. v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
  5. Equitable Life Ins. Co. of Iowa v. HauserCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Helen S. Cardwell, Administratrix of the Estate of Winfred M. Cardwell, Deceased v. The Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
  2. Ranger, Inc. v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. Of United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1952
  3. Cobosco v. Life Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  4. United States v. RaoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1970
  5. New York Life Ins. Co. v. StonerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API