American Fruit Distributors v. Hines
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.
The causes above entitled were brought in the superior court and by agreement of the parties the evidence heard and stipulations made were deemed to apply in both. Judgments were rendered in favor of the plaintiff, from which judgments defendants have appealed. The questions presented on appeal are the same in both cases; hence the two appeals will be considered together.
The actions were to recover from the defendants the value of certain shipments of cantaloupes amounting in all to about twelve carloads. Each carload was billed as a separate shipment and bills of lading were issued to the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Railroad Co. v. LockwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Missouri Pacific Railroad v. AultSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Boston & Maine Railroad v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Pennsylvania R. Co. v. Olivit BrothersSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- International & Great Northern Railway Co. v. TisdaleTexas Supreme Court · 1889
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. StarleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Thayer v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1961
- Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Northern Pacific Terminal Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1953
- Muelder v. Western Greyhound LinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Ritchie v. Oregon Short Line R. R. Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1926
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.