Legal Opinion

Driver v. Pape Kenworth

District Court, E.D. California

Decided May 27, 2020No. 2:17-cv-01968Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROGER DRIVER; Case No. 2:17-cv-01968-KJN 11 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF-IN- INTERVENTION ACCIDENT FUND 12 v. INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO 13 PAPE TRUCKS, INC. an Oregon FILE COMPLAINT-IN-INTERVENTION Corporation; 14 ECF No. 50 Defendant. 15 16 PAPE TRUCKS, INC. 17 Third-Party Plaintiff, 18 v. 19 JOMAR INVESTMENTS, INC. dba NEW LIFE TRANSPORT PARTS CENTER, and 20 ROES 1-10, Inclusive, 21 Third-Party Defendants. 22 23 ACCIDENT FUND INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, 24…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Arakaki v. CayetanoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. Dailey v. Dallas Carriers Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1996
  3. Coastal Berry Co. v. Agricultural Labor Relations BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  4. Mason v. ScarpuzzaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API