Abraham v. Kendall
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.
Plaintiff is in the business of selling mobile homes, and defendant is the owner of a mobile home park. Plaintiff alleges that defendant breached an oral agreement that was reached between plaintiff and defendant’s agent, Richard Pleasant, the manager of the park.1 Defendant moved for and the trial court granted summary judgment on the ground, inter alia, that the agreement is within the Statute of Frauds, ORS 41.580, and is therefore not actionable. We reverse.
In February, 1980, Pleasant rented plaintiff a space in the park on a month-to-month basis. Plaintiff intended to place a mobile home…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wiggins v. Barrett & Associates, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
- Sherman, Clay & Co. v. Buffum & PendletonOregon Supreme Court · 1919
- Share v. WILLIAMS ET UXOregon Supreme Court · 1955
- McDaniels v. HarringtonOregon Supreme Court · 1916
- Masquart v. DickOregon Supreme Court · 1957
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hathaway v. B & J Property Investments, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
- Martin v. AllbrittonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993