Wheeler v. Piazza
District Court, E.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
Robert M. Dow, Jr., United States District Judge
In his Second Amended Complaint, Plaintiff Paul Wheeler renews his claims against Defendants Peter Piazza, Sydney Roberts, Donnelle Grygiel, and Elmer Garza (collectively "Defendants") for conspiring to and then violating his First Amendment rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 *875as well as Illinois state law. Currently before the Court is Defendant's motion to dismiss [54] Plaintiff's second amended complaint for failure to state a claim. For the reasons explained below, Defendants motion [54] is denied in part and granted in part. Count VI is dismissed…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Gregory Turley v. Dave RednourCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Brewster McCauley v. City of ChicagCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Bobby Curry v. Pedro GuzmanDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2024
- Brooks v. Elgin Die Mold CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2025
- Conway v. City Of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021
- Corona v. City of Chicago, Department of Animal Care and ControlDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023
- Culp v. Harrah's Illinois CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.