Emi Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
NARICK, Senior Judge.
The issues presented are whether Arthur Rathman’s (Claimant’s) loss of earning power was due to a work-related injury or whether it was due to his layoff for economic reasons, whether the testimony of Claimant’s physician was incompetent as a matter of law, and - whether EMI Company (Employer) is entitled to a credit for severance pay provided to Claimant upon his layoff. Because the Workers’ Compensation-Appeal Board (Board) correctly resolved these issues, the decision of the Board, which granted benefits pursuant to the Workers’ Compensation Act,1 is affirmed.
The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bethenergy Mines, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Newcomer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Wallace v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Ogden Aviation Services v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kramer v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Rite Aid Corp.)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Daley v. Spinnaker Industries, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
- Kramer v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Rite Aid Corp.)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002