Legal Opinion

Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Davis

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 3, 1992No. 3239PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPOVICH, Judge.

This is an appeal from the October 1, 1991, order granting summary judgment in favor of appellee Aetna Casualty & Surety Company (“Aetna”). We reverse.

Most recently, this Court re-stated the standard of review with regard to an order granting summary judgment; to-wit:

Summary judgment may properly be entered only if “the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Pa.R.Civ.P.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Allstate Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  2. Murphy & Co. v. Manufacturers' Casualty Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  3. Myers v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
  4. Orcutt v. Erie Indemnity Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  5. Gross v. KubelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance v. SartnoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Bogert, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Monroe County2000
  3. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance v. SartnoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance v. SartnoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API