In re the Detention of Anderson

¶77 (concurring in dissent) — I find I cannot join either the majority or the dissent. I cannot join the majority’s holding that John Charles Anderson’s consensual relationships with four adult men constitute recent overt acts.24 The majority misstates the record, and the conduct at issue is not sufficiently related to Anderson’s diagnosis and pattern of nonconsensual, abusive relationships with children, and inappropriate behavior toward *568women. I cannot join the dissent because it unnecessarily posits a new definition of a recent overt act25 and implies the statutory definition is…