Legal Opinion
United States v. William Harry Hack, Jr., Lucas Clinton Owens
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 23, 1986No. 85-1068, 85-1079PublishedCited by 79 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WESLEY E. BROWN, Senior District Judge.
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R. App.P. 34(a); Tenth Cir.R. 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
These are appeals from judgments of conviction entered in the United States District Court for the District of Wyoming following a jury trial. Defendants Lucas Clinton Owens and William Harry Hack were convicted of conspiring to commit air piracy in…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Estelle v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by79 opinions
- Mitchell v. MaynardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Arthur Ronald Crittendon A/K/A Jabbar Muwakkil RagibCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. CardallCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Alfred Lee ApodacaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Patricia Williams A/K/A CandyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.