Legal Opinion
United States v. Cardall
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided September 6, 1989No. Nos. 87-1582, 87-1587, 87-1589, 87-1592, 87-1594 and 87-1625PublishedCited by 148 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McKAY, Circuit Judge.
Defendants Richard Taylor Cardall, Barry Crowther, Joseph A. Holman, Stanley L. Willmitt, Gerald L. Turner, and Farrell Anderson appeal their convictions for mail fraud, wire fraud, the interstate transportation of money taken by fraud (ITSP), bankruptcy fraud, and violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO).
I
In order to facilitate our analysis, we first outline the scheme to defraud and the interrelated entities and individuals involved.
A. Entities.
1. FSI: Fiscal Services, Inc. (FSI) operated between 1979-80 as a payables “factoring”…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by148 opinions
- Tal v. HoganCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. PungitoreCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- United States v. WackerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. EufrasioCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Edwin Edwards Stephen Edwards Cecil Brown Andrew Martin Bobby JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
143 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.