Legal Opinion

Stockton v. . Lenoir

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 30, 1929PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stacy, C. J.,

after stating the case: It appears that the plaintiff and the defendant, who are presumed to know best what was intended by their agreement, have heretofore interpreted the notes in suit to mean that they should be paid only out of funds collected from Almazov and Albert. If this be a reasonable or permissible interpretation of the record, and we think it is, it follows that there was error in the court’s peremptory instruction to the jury.

The defendant, it seems, was willing to pay the plaintiff a substantial sum for his services, provided the sale was completed and the full…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Typewriter Co. v. . Hardware Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  2. National Bank v. WinslowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  3. Joice v. . BohananSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1857

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. North Carolina National Bank v. GillespieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. Jefferson Standard Life Insurance v. MoreheadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  3. BORDEN, INCORPORATED v. BrowerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  4. Dallas Dome Wyoming Oil Fields Co. v. BrooderWyoming Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Hill v. Star Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API