State Ex Rel. v. Nadel, C-070673 (11-9-2007)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION.
{¶ 1} Though we recognize that pretrial costs can be exorbitant, and we understand the relator's plight in this case, we cannot substitute our discretion for that of the trial court in matters regarding the management of its docket. Accordingly, the writ of mandamus sought by relator, Givaudan Flavors Corporation, to compel the respondent, Judge Norbert A. Nadel, to rule on pretrial motions and to vacate a case-management order is denied, and Judge Nadel's dismissal motion is granted.
{¶ 2} Givaudan, a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Cincinnati, Ohio, is a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State ex rel. Berger v. McMonagleOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. HochhauslerOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- State ex rel. Taylor v. GlasserOhio Supreme Court · 1977
- State ex rel. Rashada v. PiankaOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- State Ex Rel. Rodgers v. Cuyahoga County Court of Common PleasOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.