Lou. & Nash. R. R. v. Ballard
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Case 25 — PETITION ORDINARY — APPEAL FROM MARION CIRCUIT COURT. Where the claim is for punitive damages it should be left to the-jury to say whether they will give punitive damages. (L. & N. R. R. Co. v. Brooks, 83 Ky., 139.) An opinion of this court rendered on a former appeal is the law of this case and not subject to review or modification on the second appeal. (LeGrand v. Baker, 6 Monroe, 243; Mason v. Mason, 5 Bush,; 193.)
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGE BENNETT
delivered the opinion of the court.
The appellee, a young lady, was, in February, 1882;. teaching school at Loretto, Marion county, Ky. Her father lived between a half and a mile from a flag-station on the appellant’s road, known as Harper’s. Ferry. The appellee, on Saturday evenings, usually went to her father’s home and returned again on Monday morning to her school. She made her trips to and *160from Harper’s Ferry station on the appellant’s passenger train. Her father was in the habit of meeting her at Harper’s Ferry, and taking her from that place to his home on "horseback. She,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Lou. & Nash. R. R. v. BallardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1887
3Cited by17 opinions
- Forrester v. Southern Pacific Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1913
- Yazoo & Mississippi Valley Railroad v. WilliamsMississippi Supreme Court · 1905
- Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. Woodford & IrelandCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
- Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
- Lamaster v. WilkersonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.