Legal Opinion

Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. Woodford & Ireland

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 21, 1913PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from Fayette Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Miller

Affirming.

On November 17, 1910, the appellant, the Louisville & Nashville Eailroad Company received from the appellees, Catesby Woodford and John T. Ireland, seven thoroughbred horses, at Lexington, Kentucky, for 'shipment and transportation to Juarez, Mexico. The petition alleges that the plaintiffs, in order to- afford the necessary light in the oar which contained' the horses, equipped said car with two suitable lanterns in the manner usual and customary in the shipment of horses over railroads, by hanging, swinging, wiring and anchoring said lanterns in…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Alexander v. HumberCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1888
  2. Lou. & Nash. R. R. v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1888
  3. Cox's Admr. v. L. & N. R. R.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  4. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. McCoyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1883
  5. Toner's Admr. v. South Covington & C. Street Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1900

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  2. Peak v. ArnettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  3. Ray v. RayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  4. Spiegle v. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  5. Kirby's Administrator v. Berea CollegeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API