Legal Opinion
Hacienda Mexican Restaurant of Kalamazoo Corp. v. Hacienda Franchise Group, Inc.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided April 8, 1991No. 71A04-9005-CV-00234PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHARPNACK, Judge.
Defendants-appellants-franchisees, - Hacienda Mexican Restaurant of Kalamazoo Corp., Albert Mickelson, and Seott Borsodi (hereinafter "franchisees") bring this interlocutory appeal from the grant of a preliminary - injunction. _- Plaintiff-appellee-fran-chisor, Hacienda Franchise Group, Inc. (hereinafter "franchisor'") has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on the basis that the questions presented are moot. We find that the appeal is not moot, and we affirm in part and reverse in part.
Franchisor raises one issue:
Is franchisees' appeal moot due to the fact that franchisees…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Processed Plastic Company, Counterdefendant-Appellant v. Warner Communications, Inc., and Warner Bros., Inc., Counterplaintiff-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Ideal Industries, Inc. v. Gardner Bender, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- Wright-Moore Corporation, Cross-Appellee v. Ricoh Corporation, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Brown v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1941
- Rees v. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1978
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Campbell v. SpadeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
- Fumo v. Medical Group of Michigan City, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- Thornton-Tomasetti Engineers v. Indianapolis-Marion County Public LibraryIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. Associated Dry Goods Corp.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1992
- Two Men & a Truck/International Inc. v. Two Men & a Truck/Kalamazoo, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.