Legal Opinion
Wright-Moore Corporation, Cross-Appellee v. Ricoh Corporation, Cross-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided August 28, 1990No. 89-2784, 89-2854PublishedCited by 78 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FLAUM, Circuit Judge.
This case arises out of defendant Ricoh Corporation’s (“Ricoh”) refusal to renew its national distributorship agreement with plaintiff Wright-Moore Corporation (“Wright-Moore”) after the expiration of its one year term. On a motion for summary judgment, the district court, applying Indiana law, held that Ricoh had good cause not to renew Wright-Moore’s franchise agreement and did so without bad faith or discrimination, in compliance with the Indiana franchise statutes. See Ind. Code §§ 23-2-2.5-1, et seq., 23-2-2.7-1, et seq. The court further held that Ricoh did not…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Healy v. Beer InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Modern Computer Systems, Inc. v. Modern Banking Systems, Inc. Modern Banking Systems of Southern WisconsinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
- Bush v. National School Studios, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
- W. H. Barber Co. v. HughesIndiana Supreme Court · 1945
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by78 opinions
- Cromeens, Holloman, Sibert, Inc. v. AB VolvoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- The Original Great American Chocolate Chip Cookie Company, Incorporated v. River Valley Cookies, Limited, Robert M. Sigel, Paula SigelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Instructional Systems, Inc. v. Computer Curriculum Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. BushCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Digital Equipment Corporation v. Uniq Digital Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.