Wright v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Indictment for burglary; from Coffee superior court—Judge Parker. November 13, 1912.
1Opinion of the CourtHill, C. J.
The plaintiffs in error were convicted of burglary, and their motion for a new trial was overruled. The indictment alleged that the house burglarized was “the smoke-house and meat house, being a house within the curtilage of the residence of D. S. Wall.” The only point of any materiálity raised by the record is that the smoke-house was not within the curtilage of the dwelling-house. The proof on this point is as follows: “The smoke-house was situated on the edge of the yard. It was only a short distance from the crib and barns. These buildings were all located immediately' around our…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. ShawSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1850
- Ivey v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1878
- Hutchins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Bryant v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1878
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. KaplanDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1923
- Bunn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Kelley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Olson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Rutter v. RutterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.