Legal Opinion
Rutter v. Rutter
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided July 13, 2012No. A12A0661PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Blackwell, Judge.
In this divorce case, Charles Rutter moved the court below to exclude any evidence that his wife, Stacy Rutter, might have derived from several video surveillance devices that she surreptitiously installed in their marital residence. Charles argued that her use of these devices amounts to a violation of OCGA § 16-11-62 (2), which makes it generally unlawful for one to conduct video surveillance of another in a private place, out of public view, and without his consent.1 But at a hearing on the motion, the court below pointed to OCGA § 16-11-62 (2) (C), which sets out an…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- United States v. DunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Gilbert v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
- Haley v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2011
- Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Gibson v. GibsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017
- Jayko v. the StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
- Malphurs v. the StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
- Corey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
- Rutter v. RutterSupreme Court of Georgia · 2013
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.