Pobreslo v. Joseph M. Boyd Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Butler
Chapter 128 of the Wisconsin Statutes, 1929, regulates and controls voluntary assignments for the benefit of creditors and also contains provisions relating to the discharge of insolvent debtors. By this appeal we are called on to decide whether as construed below the provisions of that chapter which relate to voluntary assignments for the benefit of creditors, and especially a clause contained in § 128.06, conflict with the National Bankruptcy Act. The clause declares: “No creditor shall, in any case where a debtor has made or attempted to make an assignment for the benefit of creditors, or…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Stellwagen v. ClumSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Straton v. NewSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- International Shoe Co. v. PinkusSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- West Co. v. LeaSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Mayer v. HellmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Kesler v. Department of Public Safety of UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Deitz v. FordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Fidelity Trust Co. v. Union National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Sherwood Partners, Inc. v. Lycos, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Gelatt v. DeDakisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.