Legal Opinion
Daluz v. ACME Auto Body & Sales, Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided December 10, 1992No. 3:90CV00719 (WWE)Published
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
EGINTON, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiff, Terryl Daluz, brought this action against Defendant, ACME Auto Body & Sales, Inc. (“ACME”) alleging that ACME violated the Motor Vehicle Information and Cost Savings Act (“MVICS Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 1989. This case is now before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. For the reasons set forth below, both motions will be denied.
FACTS
Defendant ACME has been selling used cars for over twelve years. In December 1988, ACME sold Plaintiff Daluz his first car, a used 1984 Renault…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- American International Group, Inc. v. London American International Corporation Limited and Midland Bank LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Daniel Norman Ryan v. E. W. Edwards, Jr., Tappahannock Ford, Inc., John C. Duval, IndividuallyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
- Schwabenbauer v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.