Legal Opinion

Little Deli Marts, Inc. v. City of Kent

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 16, 2001No. 46744-1-IPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWebster, J.

The City of Kent imposed an assessment upon Little Deli Marts for a local improvement district (LID) to construct an arterial road improvement. Although Little Deli missed the statutory appeal deadline, it sued the City collaterally because the assessment came before completion of the improvement. The trial court dismissed the case for lack of (1) subject matter jurisdiction, (2) a claim upon which relief may be granted, and (3) a genuine issue of material fact. Little Deli appeals, arguing it may collaterally attack the assessment because assessments before completion of the improvement…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Seattle v. Rogers Clothing for Men, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Ankeny v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Aloha Sanitary District v. WilkensOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Felker v. City of New WhatcomWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Patchell v. City of PuyallupCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Tiffany Family Trust Corp. v. City of KentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  2. Tiffany Family Trust Corp. v. City of KentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  3. Little Deli Marts, Inc. v. City of KentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  4. Hamilton Corner I, Llc, Appellanbt V City Of NapavineCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  5. Joyce Kelley v. Pierce County, Mark Skagren & "jane Doe" SkagrenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API