Legal Opinion

Manning v. Bresnahan

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 11, 1886PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Muskegon. (Bussell, J.) B,eplevin. .Plaintiff- brings error. The facts p,re stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.

On the twenty-fourth of March, 1883, the defendant, as sheriff of Muskegon county, attached a stock of goods by virtue of a writ issued out of the circuit court of that county in favor of Samuel P. Wilcox, Edward O. Wilcox, and George T. Wolcott, composing the firm of S. P. Wilcox & Co., as plaintiffs, and John E. Garrigus as defendant.

The plaintiff in this suit, claiming to have purchased the stock of goods from Garrigus on the nineteenth day of March, 1883, replevied them from the sheriff.

This suit was tried, and resulted in a verdict and judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Taff v. HosmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Cook v. HopperMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Bostwick v. BenjaminMichigan Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Delahunt v. FintonMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Knoper v. BurtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Thompson v. PetersMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Gass v. Van WagnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Moskalik v. DunnMichigan Supreme Court · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API