Legal Opinion

Bostwick v. Benjamin

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1886PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Oakland. (Stickney, J.) Bill filed to set aside an assignment of certain mortgages as fraudulent. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

William C. Richardson and the defendant Henry S. Cox were in copartnership for a short time. In April, 1881, Richardson began a suit in chancery to close up the partnership, claiming an indebtedness from Cox to him.

Cox appeared, and filed an answer, but defended no further.

In October, 1881, Richardson obtained a decree dissolving the partnership, and fixing the amount owing to him from Cox at the sum of $475. Upon this decree execution was issued and returned unsatisfied.

January 30, 1882, Richardson filed a creditor’s bill against Cox, who appeared therein, but filed no answer.

April 19, 1882,…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Manning v. BresnahanMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Bly v. BradyMichigan Supreme Court · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API