Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Kulongoski v. Cunning

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 13, 1996No. 9405-03071; CA A85717Published

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, P. J.

Plaintiff, the Oregon Attorney General, issued an investigative demand, pursuant to ORS 646.618, to defendant, a certified public accountant. The demand relates to possible conduct by defendant, arising out of his professional activities, that allegedly violates the Unlawful Trade Practices Act (UTPA). ORS 646.605 et seq. Pursuant to ORS 646.626, plaintiff filed a petition in the circuit court, seeking an order that defendant show cause why he should not comply with the demand. Defendant countered with a motion to quash the demand, pursuant to ORS 646.618(2), asserting that his professional…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Vendall Marketing Corp. v. Dept. of JusticeOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State ex rel. Frohnmayer v. FreemanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API