Legal Opinion

Thorndell v. Munn

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 30, 1929No. Appeal, 74PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Simpson,

Plaintiff, as personal representative of the estate of Mary Ellen Kirkwood (hereinafter called decedent), and as residuary legatee under her will, filed a bill in equity to set aside a transfer of certain bank stock, constituting, in value, about five-sixths of her estate, made by her to defendant more than six years before her death, and at no time repudiated by her. The chancellor advised that the bill be dismissed, but the court in banc, the chancellor dissenting, decreed as prayed for, and defendant appeals.

The nature of the principal differences of fact…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. McConville v. InghamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  2. Phillips's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  3. Worrall's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1885
  4. Miller's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  5. Darlington's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Belmont Laboratories, Inc. v. HeistSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  2. McCown v. FraserSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Null's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. Lochinger v. HanlonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  5. Kees v. GreenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API