Legal Opinion

Inhabitants of Eagle Lake v. Inhabitants of Fort Kent

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided February 23, 1918PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Action on the case to recover for pauper supplies. At close of evidence case was reported to Law Court by agreement. Judgment in accordance with opinion. Case stated in opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCornish, C. J.

This is an action to recover for pauper supplies furnished one Dennis Michaud and wife, and comes to this court on report. Two issues of fact are presented. First, Did Dennis Michaud have a derivative settlement from his father, Baptiste Michaud, in the defendant town, as claimed by the plaintiffs? Second, If so, had he lost that derivative settlement and acquired one in his own right in the plaintiff town at the time the supplies were furnished, as claimed by the defendants?

The chronological facts are these. Dennis Michaud was born in Fort Kent in 1883 and lived there until he was…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Inhabitants of Gouldsboro v. Inhabitants of SullivanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1934
  2. Inhabitants of Fort Fairfield v. Inhabitants of MillinocketSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1940
  3. Inhabitants of Madison v. Inhabitants of FairfieldSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API