Inhabitants of Madison v. Inhabitants of Fairfield
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtDunn, J.
This case was reserved for final decision by this court on a report of the legally admissible evidence. The action is for the support of one William Elwood Bassett, and his wife and children, who derive their settlement from him as paupers. Inquiry is quite narrow in its scope. The decisive question is whether, under the statutes of this State, Bassett had his settlement in the defendant town of Fairfield, when, on the ninth day of August, 1930, he fell into distress in Madison, and received, for himself and family, the pauper supplies in suit.
William Elwood Bassett attained full age on the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Inhabitants of Rumford v. Inhabitants of UptonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1915
- Inhabitants of Eagle Lake v. Inhabitants of Fort KentSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1918
- Inhabitants of South Thomaston v. Inhabitants of FriendshipSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1901
- Inhabitants of Knox v. Inhabitants of MontvilleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1904
3Cited by3 opinions
- Inhabitants of Gouldsboro v. Inhabitants of SullivanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1934
- Inhabitants of Town of Bethel v. INHABITANTS, ETC.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1955
- Inhabitants of Moscow v. Inhabitants of SolonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1939