Legal Opinion

Munoz v. New Jersey Automobile Full Insurance Underwriting Ass'n

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided May 24, 1995PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed by Judge Bilder in his written opinion of March 8, 1994. Munoz v. Quinn, 284 N.J.Super. 61, 663 A.2d 139 (Law Div.1994). Judge Bilder relied on the view expressed by Judge Schwartz in Christian v. Ormsby, 267 N.J.Super. 237, 263, 631 A.2d 158 (Law Div.1992), in concluding that the cancellation notice was invalid and unenforceable because it was premature and violated a legislative provision for a fifteen day grace period for the cure of a default in the payment of a premium. We fully subscribe to the reasoning set forth in Christian.

We are…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Christian v. OrmsbyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
  2. Munoz v. QuinnNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Munoz v. New Jersey Automobile Full Insurance Underwriting Ass'nSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
  2. Gatto v. New Jersey Automobile Full Insurance Underwriting Ass'nNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995
  3. Munoz v. New Jersey Automobile Full Insurance Underwriting Ass'nSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API