Legal Opinion

Munoz v. New Jersey Automobile Full Insurance Underwriting Ass'n

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 15, 1996Published

1Opinion of the Court

145 N.J. 377 (1996)

678 A.2d 1051

JOSE R. MUNOZ, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

NEW JERSEY AUTOMOBILE FULL INSURANCE UNDERWRITING ASSOCIATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND STANLEY AGENCY, INC., JOHN QUINN AND JOHN DOE, JOINTLY, SEVERALLY, AND IN THE ALTERNATIVE, DEFENDANTS.

JAMES ZIMMERMAN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

THE NEW JERSEY AUTOMOBILE FULL INSURANCE UNDERWRITING ASSOCIATION (N.J.A.F.I.U.A.), DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND JOHN DOES 1-10 (FICTITIOUS NAMES), DEFENDANTS.

PATRICIA NAPOLITANO, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued February 27,…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Merin v. MaglakiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  2. State v. ButlerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  3. Young v. Schering Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  4. Amerada Hess Corp. v. Director, Division of Taxation, New Jersey Department of the TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. In Re the Closing of Jamesburg High SchoolSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API