Nixon v. Raymond City Coal & Transportation Co.
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
1 Opinion op the Court by
Judge Fulton
Affiring;
The appellant, Abram H. Nixon, at the time in controversy was employed by the appellee, the Raymond City Coal and Transportation ■ Company, as a crane operator on a “digger,” which is a boat operating on the Ohio river used largely in unloading coal from barges. The digger is equipped with a crane and bucket by means of which coal was being placed in a dump car and carried up the bank of the river on rails to a tipple. The dump car was drawn up the rails to the tipple by means of a cable operating through a pulley at the tipple, the power being…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State Industrial Comm'n of NY v. Nordenholt Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Nogueira v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- The Admiral PeoplesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Minnie v. Port Huron Terminal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Steely v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Jump v. Ashland Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1953