Legal Opinion

Nixon v. Raymond City Coal & Transportation Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided December 8, 1939PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

1 Opinion op the Court by

Judge Fulton

Affiring;

The appellant, Abram H. Nixon, at the time in controversy was employed by the appellee, the Raymond City Coal and Transportation ■ Company, as a crane operator on a “digger,” which is a boat operating on the Ohio river used largely in unloading coal from barges. The digger is equipped with a crane and bucket by means of which coal was being placed in a dump car and carried up the bank of the river on rails to a tipple. The dump car was drawn up the rails to the tipple by means of a cable operating through a pulley at the tipple, the power being…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State Industrial Comm'n of NY v. Nordenholt Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Nogueira v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. The Admiral PeoplesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Minnie v. Port Huron Terminal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Steely v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jump v. Ashland Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API