Legal Opinion

Steely v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided December 4, 1934PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Creal, Commissioner

Affirming.

Earl Steely instituted this action against the Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company for damages for personal injuries sustained by him while in the employment of the latter, and from a judgment entered in accordance with the directed verdict dismissing his petition is prosecuting this appeal.

his petition, appellant alleged in substance that, appellee negligently failed to furnish him a safe place in which to work and safe and necessary appliances with which to perform his work, and that by reason of such negligent failure upon its part, a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Shemwell v. Owensboro & N. R. R.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1904
  2. Louisville Water Co. v. DarnellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
  3. Lee v. Marion National BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1893
  4. Crouch v. NolandCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  5. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ward v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943
  2. Clover Splint Coal Co. v. LorenzCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
  3. Phillips v. Keltner's Adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
  4. Read v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
  5. Capps v. PenceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API