Legal Opinion

Minnie v. Port Huron Terminal Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 3, 1935No. 678PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Hughes

Petitioner, a longshoreman, was injured at Port Huron while unloading a vessel lying in navigable water. He was about his work on the deck of the vessel when he was struck by a swinging hoist, lifting cargo from a hatch, and was precipitated upon the wharf. He sought compensation under the compensation act of the State of Michigan. His employer, the Port Huron Terminal Company, contended that the accident occurred upon navi gable water and. that the state law did not apply. The defense was overruled by the state commission in the view that the injury must have been occasioned by petitioner’s…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Company v. JensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Grant Smith-Porter Ship Co. v. RohdeSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. State Industrial Comm'n of NY v. Nordenholt Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Nogueira v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  5. T. Smith & Son, Inc. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. Executive Jet Aviation, Inc. v. City of ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Victory Carriers, Inc. v. LawSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Davis v. Department of Labor and Industries of Wash.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Victory Carriers, Inc. v. LawSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Swanson v. Marra Brothers, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API