Legal Opinion
In Re Referendum on City of Trenton Ordinance 09-02
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided April 6, 2010No. A-70 September Term 2009Published
1Opinion of the Court
990 A.2d 1109 (2010)
201 N.J. 349
In re PETITION FOR REFERENDUM ON CITY OF TRENTON ORDINANCE 09-02.
A-70 September Term 2009.
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued March 22, 2010.
Decided April 6, 2010.
George T. Dougherty argued the cause for appellant Committee of Petitioners (Katz & Dougherty, Mercerville, attorneys).
William W. Northgrave, Newark, argued the cause for respondent City of Trenton (McManimon & Scotland, attorneys; Mr. Northgrave, Edward J. McManimon, III, and Jaime R. Placek, on the brief).
Ira G. Megdal, Cherry Hill, argued the cause for intervenor-respondent New Jersey-American Water…
Also in this document: Per curiam; Dissent.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Manalapan Realty v. Township Committee of the Township of ManalapanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- DiProspero v. PennSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
- Bosland v. Warnock Dodge, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2009
- Burnett v. County of BergenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2009
- Pizzullo v. New Jersey Manufacturers InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.