State v. . Williams

Pee, CuRiAM.

The principal question presented by the appeal is the sufficiency of the evidence to carry the case to the jury.

There was no charge of conspiracy in the indictment, which was drawn in accordance with the provisions of C. S., 4175, consequently, the inquiry arises: Did the defendant “counsel, procure, or command” Fred Wade to commit the crime?

The evidence tends to show the following facts:(a) All the parties were actively engaged in the liquor business.(b) The defendant carried certain empty kegs to the scene of the crime about an hour before sunset.(c) The defendant informed Eddie…